Digest Week 4 Michaelmas Term 2026

MT26, Week 4 (1 November - 7 November)

If you have entries for the weekly Digest, please send information to admin@philosophy.ox.ac.uk by midday, Tuesday the week before the event. 

For events occurring at the Institute for Ethics in AI, see here.

Philosophy of Mathematics Seminar

Philosophy of Mathematics Seminar (Monday, Week 4, MT26 - 16:30-18:30)

02 November 2026
Davide Sutto (Christ Church, Oxford): 'Axiomatizing the Weak Iterative Conception of Set, Part 1: Constructible Level Theory'; Ryle Room (20.339), Schwarzman Centre  
Post-Kantian European Philosophy Seminar

Post-Kantian European Philosophy Seminar (Tuesday, Week 4, MT26 - 16:00-18:00)

03 November 2026
Evaldo Sampaio (Federal University of Ceará): 'A Tragic Conception of Necessity: Nietzsche and the Possibility of Wisdom'; Ryle Room (20.339), Schwarzman Centre
chess king white background victory shadow black 1418482 pxhere com

DPhil Seminar (Wednesday, Week 4, MT26 - 16:00-18:00)

04 November 2026
Matthew Hitchens (Lincoln College): 'Recognising Life'; Ryle Room (20.339), Schwarzman Centre
Philosophy of Physics Graduate Lunch Seminar

Philosophy of Physics Graduate Lunch Seminar (Thursday, Week 4, MT26 - 13:00-14:30)

05 November 2026
Bryan Cheng (Oxford): 'Coordinating the sphere (or: do spheres dream of coordinate systems?)'; Seminar Room (20.306), Schwarzman Centre
Ockham Society

The Ockham Society (Thursday, Week 4, MT26 - 14:00-15:00)

05 November 2026
Xichen Li (Pembroke College): 'Imitation and Being Imitative in Socrates’s Critique of Poetry in the Republic’
Philosophical Society

The Jowett Society (Friday, Week 4, MT26 - 15:00-18:00)

06 November 2026
Robert Northcott (Birkbeck University of London): 'Fragility and the impact of AI'; Lecture Theatre L1 (10.300), Schwarzman Centre

Notices

Other Philosophy events, including those taking place elsewhere in the university and beyond

Enlarging Reason Seminar Series

Moral Perception and Moral Reasoning 

Date: Monday, 2 November, 4–5:30pm

Venue: Large Seminar Room, St Cross College

Speaker: Michael Wee

For more information on the workshop series and details of each talk, please check the website. Registration is recommended to help with event-planning. 

Please feel free to contact the organisers at jana.sedlakova@ethox.ox.ac.uk or michael.wee@ethox.ox.ac.uk in case of any queries. 

 

Avicenna Reading Group

Convenor: Ibrahim Safri

Date: Tuesday, 3 November, 2–3:30pm

Venue: Magdalen College, McFarlane Library 

The theory of time remains one of the most complex and significant subjects of inquiry, central to both philosophical and physical discourse globally. Throughout the history of world philosophy, this concept has been continually refined, spanning Late Antiquity and Neoplatonism through to Islamic, Medieval, and Early Modern philosophical traditions. Within the global corpus of Arabic philosophy, diverse interpretations of time have emerged, shaped by three primary perspectives that influenced Islamic medieval conceptions of this theory. This reading class will focus on Avicenna’s The Physics of The Healing, in which he presents various notions of time before establishing his own account.

This MT26, and following a comprehensive introduction to the concept of time in global Arabic philosophy, we will continue with Chapter 11, on the Essence of Time.

Text: Avicenna, The Physics of The Healing; a Parallel English-Arabic Text. Translated by: Jon McGinnis. Provo, Utah: Brigham Young University Press, 2009.

 

Finnegans Wake Seminar

"Laden with the Loot of Learning”: The Wake and Learned Wit

Speaker: Steven Connor (King's College London)

Date: Tuesday, 3 November, 5:30pm-6.45pm

Venue: Lecture Room 2, Christ Church

The talk will consider the epistemopathy, or feelings about knowledge, of Joyce’s Wake, relating it to the tradition, extending from Aristophanes onward, of the learned mockery of learning.

Further information can be found here

Ethox Seminar Series

Paternalism and Oppression

Speakers: Daniel Groll (Carleton) Jonathan Parry (LSE)

Date: Wednesday, 4 November, 2-3:30pm

Venue: Seminar Room 0, Big Data Institute, Oxford

This paper explores how the quality of the relationship between a would-be paternalist and their target bears on the ethics of paternalism. Beginning with Tommie Shelby’s suggestion in Dark Ghettos that the US government lacks the standing to paternalise poor, urban African Americans due to the latter’s oppression at the hands of the former, we develop the idea that the anti-paternalist constraint is rendered more stringent when the paternalist and the paternalisee share a bad relationship. This does not mean that such paternalism is always impermissible in this context. But it does typically mean that the intervener is required to achieve more good and/or to make greater efforts to avoid paternalism than they would be in the absence of the bad relationship. We conclude by reflecting on how bad relationships can be repaired and the heightened constraint on paternalism thereby ameliorated.

Register here

In person and on Zoom

Space Settlements and Future Generations

Space Ethics Seminar #3

Convenor: Koji Tachibana (Chiba University) 

Speakers: Oskari Sivuka (University of Helsinki) and Gary David O'Brien (Lingnan University) 

Date: Thursday, 5 November, 12:45–1:45pm

Venue: Suite 1 (1st floor), Uehiro Oxford Institute, 16-17 Saint Ebbe's St, Oxford OX1 1PT

Abstract: Before too long, humans may establish permanent settlements on other planets and moons, and this may entail procreation off-Earth. This raises serious ethical issues explored in this talk. Given the harsh conditions and lower prospects for wellbeing faced by people born in space settlements, we must ask whether it is permissible to reproduce in such circumstances. Against the sceptical position common in the literature, we argue that procreation off-Earth may be permissible if certain conditions are met. We argue that a plausible threshold for permissible procreation can be grounded in needs-based sufficientarianism, according to which future people should have the basic needs essential for autonomous pursuit of a good life. Whether this threshold can be met will depend on the specific conditions of the settlement. Because space habitats require extensive life-support systems, procreation is not merely a private matter. It has a distinctly political dimension: procreation in such contexts presupposes reliable systems and institutions capable of maintaining a sufficiently good life. If these cannot be provided, then space settlements should not be based on reproduction.

In-person at UOI. Lunch is provided from 12:00. Please register and indicate any dietary requirements: Space Ethics Seminar #3 – Fill in form